The performance of the potential Eq. 1.14 has been found to agree well with Møller-Plesset perturbation (MP2 [37]) theory second order calculations of other polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) (see section 2.4). Furthermore, a comparison of the performance of two other parametrisations has been done. One parametrisation employing MP2/cc-pVTZ potential energy surface for benzene, the other parameters have been fitted to match MP2/cc-pVTZ for coronene. The parameters are given in Table 2.4 and the corresponding curves are plotted in Figs. 2.7 and 2.9. No significant difference between these parametrisations has been found when applied to graphene-based systems (see Chapter 3). However, the force field can not describe an enhancement of aromaticity, connected with stronger binding energy. More importantly, benchmarks for non-planar systems are not available, and transferability to those systems is not guaranteed. The latter point is difficult to overcome, as meaningful calculations for those systems are beyond the limit of our today’s computational capabilities. With increasing computing power, however, these approximations can be controlled, as more elaborate ab initio model calculations will be possible.
For hydrogen the pairwise additivity assumption is known to hold at relatively low guest coverages (see Chapter 2).
At higher hydrogen densities, the guest-host interaction should depend on the guest density, so that the potential in Eq. 1.1 can no longer be treated as given.
This potential density dependence is neglected in this treatment.
Alternatively, this limitation can be circumvented by applying the Hohenberg-Kohn theory for electronic systems.[38]
The gas can be treated as
interacting particles described by a scalar function of the particle density
which is influenced by external potential. However, this study is in early stage and results are not yet available.
Lyuben Zhechkov 2007-09-04